Відео

excellent post

Technological Progress: Widespread unemployment combined with increasing inequality, will lead to social disorder, political unrest, and even threats to the sovereignty of many nations! Dr. Rajiv Malhotra

Technological progress in the past did benefit the 1% , In the present does benefit the 1% and in the future will benefit the 1% !!! The humanity in large would suffer unemployment, inequalities and have & have not!

INFINITE GROWTH IS POSSIBLE ON AN INFINTE UNIVERSE, IT IS JUST A BRAIN PROBLEM !

pure evil.

funded by the wellcomme trust. yep! these people are your enemies in the absolute. mandatory vaccines are a no go.

The destroyed ozone layer with all the moisture... crazy fks..

If government can help Elon musk for all those valuable skills, it would be so great for our country and humanity.

These very smart people have been at this for more than 40-years, and yet our economy never seems to improve. I see economics as being right up there with philosophy as just another form of mental masturbation.

Hi lk missie van you

ua-cam.com/video/jH197vpZVa0/v-deo.htmlsi=xpw-gp71pjwLVcaF

hello

Brilliant talent chosen

Brilliant talent chosen

I mean wanna help reduce plastics stop shipping stuff so far. California strawberries should stay on the west coast. Avscados stay in Mexico and so on. Reduce how far things need to travel and reduce the need to seal things away for long trips.

Shut up libtard

By YouSum Live 00:00:12 Oxford Martin School lecture welcomes Elon Musk. 00:00:27 Elon Musk discusses future of energy and transport. 00:01:59 Elon Musk's focus on transport and energy solutions. 00:02:59 Elon Musk's role as CEO of Tesla Motors and SpaceX. 00:03:56 Elon Musk's innovative approach to space exploration. 00:04:02 Tesla's revolutionary impact on the automobile industry. 00:04:49 Elon Musk's diverse ventures from PayPal to SolarCity. 00:05:30 Elon Musk's vision, bravery, and engineering prowess. 00:06:17 Elon Musk's mission to make space travel accessible. 00:07:00 Elon Musk's journey from South Africa to Silicon Valley. 00:17:24 Elon Musk's analytical approach to problem-solving. 00:19:53 SpaceX's challenging beginnings and eventual success. 00:21:41 Learning from mistakes at a small scale. 00:21:52 Successful development of Falcon 9. 00:22:10 Seizing opportunities with Dragon spacecraft. 00:22:36 Commercial industry involvement in space missions. 00:23:16 Advancing to astronaut transport missions. 00:23:45 Introducing Falcon Heavy for increased capability. 00:24:35 Pursuing fully and rapidly reusable rockets. 00:25:28 Importance of full and rapid reusability in rocketry. 00:36:00 Solar power as a key energy source for the future. 00:43:57 Establishing a self-sustaining civilization on Mars. 00:44:22 Importance of reusable launch systems for Mars missions. 00:44:34 Goal: Create a cost-effective Mars migration under $500,000. 00:45:12 Advocating for spacecraft return for cost reduction in Mars missions. 00:45:29 Confidence in the possibility of success in Mars colonization. 00:45:47 Robotics' role in Mars exploration and human relevance concerns. 00:46:01 Addressing potential AI advancements impacting human existence. 01:02:03 The significance of a carbon tax for combating climate change. 01:05:17 Urgency in taking action to mitigate climate change's momentum. 01:05:53 Optimism about the future. 01:06:42 Solar energy abundance for humanity. 01:08:02 Mars as a feasible fixer-upper planet. 01:11:41 Private and government collaboration in space exploration. 01:15:24 Intellectual property exchange over Martian resources. 01:17:14 Inefficiency of biofuels compared to solar energy. 01:20:19 Adaptations to the electrical grid for electric cars. 01:25:00 Importance of innovation, mistakes, and ambition in exploration. By YouSum Live

Ummm… no. Plastics makes our life better. All the way around. Plastics has propelled humans far beyond where we were prior. Think about every single piece of safety gear that you can think of. Every single one has plastic in it.

Sir Helm's analysis of the state of British monetary policy is just awesome. So lucid. Covers every major point. I wish that 10 minutes could be played to everyone in the country to understand where we are and what we're doing. I particularly like how he touched on the balance of payments, which is basically never covered in contemporary mainstream economics, assumed not to matter - 'it's just accounting' or even worse 'it's free goods we don't even have to work for'. I always think of it as a continual pressure to reimport the excess pounds we print, and the only possible way to reimport them is to sell capital assets, since we don't make anything foreigners want, and we don't want to devalue our currency.

Free heating from nuclear waste - he meant it… must be senility.

Amazing mind.

Nov 22, 2012

Nov 22, 2012.

We have so much to learn from him ❤ I am a dicsipel😮

The Armenta school or is it the Martin school, as might be different levels of radiation or corruption. Low noise amplifiers implanted against will by sick military veterans without American loyalty might be bad. Microchipped by cartels don’t help anyone and who is Lance Harlan Vanhorn or forty five hundred block of foxton ave. LancasterCA. David Gutierrez knows Lance , but does he know Jeff in the Navy?

*climate mitigation & finance / FCO (Laikipia Rd.) & International Development: a renewed focus on the Lake Crawford hard evidence - the contested Anthropocene varves - contrasted against the Lake Turkana ‘post Holocene’ facts (Area X: FWJj V) lays bare the tactile imperatives of the transitional ‘signalling architectures’ laid bare by the critical Anthropocene stratigraphy - establishes the merits of sustainable mineral wealth ‘licence keys’

Brilliant

Yes sir congratulations 🎉 for new heights of success

តើខ្មុំសុំនិយាយជាមួយលោកElon miosk

This speech kinda proves the point though that if you want to have Human Rights at the forefront of world politics you need to have a unipolar world under the leadership of a liberal democracy like America. Can you cope with that truth lefties?

Get the state to remove carbon in the same way it is responsible for processing sewage and solid waste. Carbon removal needs to become like the other utilities most countries provide for their populations

Green ammonia for maritime shipping makes a lot of sense. Safety (seems okay) ua-cam.com/video/1aa1p-ahKxI/v-deo.html NOx (seems okay) ua-cam.com/video/Gt2I2OSYzgM/v-deo.html Engine design (seems okay) ua-cam.com/video/S6lNl8cPVX8/v-deo.html Green ammonia supply and demand (production, ships, ports, use as fuel in ships and power plants) ua-cam.com/video/NgyHmEKfYtA/v-deo.html

👍😊✨✨✨🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🕊️. Hello. You✨

I found Hannah's case for optimism from our dire predicament quite strenuous and unconvincing, and she constructed a lot of straw men in the book in order to make her points. Her use of data in her book was selective to say the least. I also noted a number of inaccuracies (or at least significant divergencies from my own understanding of our predicament). She has also struggled to justify a lot of the positions she adopted in her own book. The section on de-growth was particularly ill informed, and the idea that renewables can replace fossil fuels, simply fanciful. I also struggled with her 'war' metaphor in the book, which I found bizarre. Her claim to absolute apolitical objectivity also, clearly indefensible. I don't concur with Hannah's definition of a 'doomer'. I regard myself as a doomer in that I think I have a realistic understanding of our predicament and tend not to seek solace in cognitive dissonance or denial. I try to be a grown up and face the grim reality of our predicament. That doesn't mean that I will ever give up hope in our ability to address some of the worst impacts of climate change - far from it - but I do push back against baseless optimism, which I regard as dangerous. Panic is an important human emotion as it can help us to conjure up the motivation and will to act on our worst fears. Buffering people from panic is unhelpful. In respect of the climate crisis, too much panic is not our problem, not enough panic is our problem. It's a shame, because I so want to encounter a positive narrative on the climate crisis in which I can believe. Hope is so difficult to come by, that I really willed Hannah to provide a convincing space for hope, but alas, I struggled to find it in her book. In order to make her somewhat plaintive case for optimism, Hannah found herself contorting and making use of accounting tricks and statistical sleight of hand. These strategies needed to be exposed. They are the same strategies used by climate deniers to such great effect. Ritchie states in the book, as cause for optimism, that the EU and USA have significantly reduced their greenhouse gas emissions. Which is, of course true, but not the cause for optimism that she suggests. Since the rise of China as the world's manufacturing powerhouse, countries like the USA, those in the EU and other developed nations have essentially delegated all of their manufacturing to China which has resulted in their own emissions reducing and China's growing. Overall, global emissions are still rising - it's just that the manufacturing component of those emissions have shifted from other G20 nations to China. This makes China look like the bad guys, when actually all they are doing is producing all of our stuff for us. Against that backdrop, you can understand why it is disingenuous for Ritchie to pick out EU and US emissions to support her case for optimism when these wealthy countries are contributing to record global emissions by buying more stuff than ever from China. At no point in her book does she caveat her positive message with these ugly truths. She's set out to write a positive book and has evidently cherry picked her data to support that thesis. This is why Greta Thunberg urges people to keep their eye on the global emissions data and nothing else. This clarity of focus makes one immune to the positive spin that the likes of Ritchie churns out. I think Bill Gates, and perhaps Elon Musk, had much more influence on this book than Hannah would ever admit. The book is a techno-optimist, neoliberal manifesto and highly ideological and, despite Hannah's assertions to the contrary, very political. She seems to be suggesting that there is a 'business as usual' route to addressing climate change and the book repeats the myth that 'we have the technology in place to solve this' - an assertion that, for me, has never stood up to scrutiny. I found it a troubling book. I recommend listening to her interview with Rachel Donald on Mongabay. Ritchie is utterly exposed. It's excruciating.

The issues facing Liam Byrne's constituents are Lack of Industrial investment. Education skills and training. Housing, Hospitals Policing . Inequality of wealth is a political , rabble rousing. This is the same argument of the low pay, 3 day week, strikes in the 1970's. The real argument is : Migration . We have a growing young migrant population With no housing , no skills, no training. All with a growing need for medical care. The only way is to : Provide investment opportunities for the capitalists to grow. We have wars everywhere, the capitalists nicest their money in safe haven economies. Switzerland, Tax havens, and US Dollars.

Thank you very much❤

Good morning beautiful world 🌎❤

Would be interested to see what Danny would say now we have chat gtp and super computers. Exponential rise in tech now.

🌎🇬🇧🇲🇺📡🧐

To create a more equal distribution of wealth the government should tax land values and remove all other kinds of taxation. The Single Tax as proposed by Henry George in 1879 in his classical book "Progress and Poverty" provided an ethical solution and this book sold at least 3 million copies. The value of useful sites of land depends on the population density in the region where these sites are available for use. Socialism does not achieve this because the managers of it have a greed that is no different to that of industrialized monopolists.

Top of the page

I'd like to know how the cuddly 'Oxford Principles' have been applied to the geoengineering operations coming from Oxford University, past & present........ 1. Which bodies are currently regulating these operations in order to ensure that geoengineering is a public good? 2. What mechanisms are in place in order to ensure transparency, public participation and informed consent? 3. Where are members of the public able to view the results, including negative results of these operations? 4. Which independent bodies are involved in assessing the risks and impacts of these operations? 5. How do members of the public access evidence that the principle of 'Governance before Deployment' has been applied?

🎉😮🎉😮🎉... nice 👍

Love u ty got to do emails etc lawyer apppotment have fun ❤